Congressional Intervention in District of Columbia Local Affairs

The quest for Statehood for the people of DC is not only about securing full representation in the US Congress, but also about securing rights to self-governance and local autonomy in the District of Columbia.

Under the District Clause of the Constitution, the U.S. Congress continues to exercise authority over DC local affairs. Congress reviews all DC legislation before it can become law. Congress can modify or even overturn such legislation. It can impose new and unwanted laws on the District. And, it retains authority over the District’s local budget, most of which is funded only by taxes levied by the District on its residents

Members of Congress routinely impose their own personal political agendas on the District of Columbia and its residents. Recent examples include:

  •   Expanded federally-funded private and religious school voucher programs.

  •   Barred District spending to offset the costs of abortions for low-income residents.

  •   Blocked DC’s medical marijuana program and prohibited legislation to tax, regulate and commercialize marijuana sales.

  •   Pushed to eliminate efforts to control gun violence.

  •   Blocked attempts to reduce the spread of HIV/AIDS with needle-exchange programs.

  •   Threatened to repeal DC marriage equality laws.

    Opinions may vary on these issues; but that is not relevant. What is relevant is the problem underlying all of them: Congress, without the consent of the governed, routinely acts to circumvent DC’s democratically-enacted laws and budgets.

    Every State in the Union enjoys the right to manage its local affairs consistent with the laws of the land and free from Congressional interference. The District of Columbia seeks no more and deserves no less.